Briand Guzman v. LG Chem Michigan Inc., et al
Briand Guzman |
LG Chem America, Inc., V Spot Vapor, Does 1 through 125, inclusive, LG Chem, Ltd., LG Chem Michigan Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv07778 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
John F Walter |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of Ventura. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of Ventura. (iv) |
|
Filing 35 STATEMENT of Decision denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (proposed statement of decision) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] #13 filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 34 STATEMENT OF DECISION (PROPOSED) filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 33 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Statement of Decision re Memorandum in Support of Motion, #30 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Statement of Decision)(Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 32 REPLY In Support of Motion TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO ADD TWO NAMED DEFENDANTS AND REQUEST FOR REMAND filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition [to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Amend] Re: Memorandum in Support of Motion, #30 (Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM in Support OF PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO ADD TWO (2) NAMED DEFENDANTS AND REQUEST FOR REMAND filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Gabriel M. Mendoza)(Mendoza, Gabriel) |
|
Filing 28 Opposition in opposition to re: First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Withdraw #26 Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Farzan, Alex) |
Filing 27 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Statement of Decision re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] #13 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Statement of Decision)(Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 26 First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Withdraw filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Ex Parte Application #24 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document uploaded incorrectly. Pages are blank. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 24 First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Withdraw , First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Remand Case to Ventura Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 23 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] #13 filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Ingold, Trevor) |
|
|
Filing 20 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] #13 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Opposition #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document uploaded incorrectly. Pages are blank. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 18 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] #13 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 17 JOINT RULE 26 REPORT filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 16 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. Demand for Jury Trial (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION of Brian W. Easton, Esq. LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL filed by Plaintiff Briand Guzman. (Mendoza, Gabriel) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Trevor J. Ingold [Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel] filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Personal Jurisdiction] filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. Motion set for hearing on 10/5/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Sooha Yang ISO Motion to Dismiss) (Ingold, Trevor) |
Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit)(Farzan, Alex) |
Filing 11 STATEMENT Joint Statement re Local Rule 7-3 filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd. (Farzan, Alex) |
|
|
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 125, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7 NOTICE Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. [Notice of Interested Parties] (Farzan, Alex) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Farzan, Alex) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Alex Farzan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 [Declaration of Alex Farzan ISO Notice of Removal] filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Farzan, Alex) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura County Superior Court, case number 56-2019-00535493 Receipt No: ACACDC-27798745 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.. (Attorney Alex Farzan added to party LG Chem, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Farzan, Alex) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem Michigan Inc., LG Chem, Ltd., V Spot Vapor, filed by plaintiff Briand Guzman. (filed in state court 10/31/19, submitted as document 1, p. 14) (esa) |
COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Briand Guzman as to V Spot Vapor. (submitted as document 1, p. 81) (esa) |
COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Briand Guzman as to LG Chem America, Inc. (submitted as document 1, p. 78) (esa) |
COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Briand Guzman as to LG Chem Michigan Inc. (submitted as document 1, p. 75) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.