Anthony Bouyer v. LAXMI Hospitality LLC et al
ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual, and Anthony Bouyer |
DOES 1-10 Inclusive, LAXMI HOSPITALITY LLC, a California limited liability company, LAXMI Hospitality LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
2:2020cv07802 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, #18 . In accordance with the Court's December 9, 2020 Order denying the Motion for Default Judgment filed by plaintiff Anthony Bouyer ("Plaintiff"), which dismissed Plaintiff's federal claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a result of Plaintiff's lack of standing, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim contained in Plaintiff's Complaint, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo) |
![]() |
Filing 17 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant LAXMI HOSPITALITY, LLC filed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer. Application set for hearing on 12/21/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit POS re Default Judgment, #9 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph) |
![]() |
Filing 15 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to LAXMI Hospitality LLC a California limited liability company. (mrgo) |
Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant LAXMI Hospitality LLC filed by plaintiff Anthony Bouyer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Re: Entry of Default) (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant LAXMI Hospitality LLC served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
![]() |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Bouyer)(Manning, Joseph) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant LAXMI Hospitality LLC. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27802555 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.