Brian Miller v. Philips North America LLC et al
| Brian Miller |
| Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company, Philips North America LLC and Does 1-20 |
| 2:2020cv07904 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #7 Non-Resident Attorney Michael R Phillips APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Philips North America LLC, designating Ashley R Li as local counsel. (bm)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael R. Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Philips North America LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27927737) filed by Defendant Philips North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Li, Ashley) |
|
Filing 6
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Philips North America LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON8/26/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Miller, upon Defendant Philips North America LLC served on 7/31/2020, answer due 8/21/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaltlyn Mannis/Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8?3/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT I) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-20, Philips North America LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Brian Miller. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/30/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Brian Miller, Plaintiff; Philips North America LLC ("PNA LLC"), Defendant; Philips Holding USA, Inc. ("PHUSA"), A holding company that is the sole member of Defendant PNA LLC NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company, identifying Brian Miller, Plaintiff; Philips North America LLC (". (Li, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company. (Li, Ashley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV28795 Receipt No: ACACDC-27840703 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - First Amended General Order, #5 Exhibit E - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulations, #6 Exhibit F - ADR Info Packet, #7 Exhibit G - Notice of Case Assignment, #8 Exhibit H - Notice of Case Management Conference, #9 Exhibit I - Proof of Service of Summons, #10 Exhibit J - Plaintiff's Notice of Case Management Conference, #11 Exhibit K - Answer to Complaint, #12 Declaration of James Durchak) (Attorney Ashley R Li added to party Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company(pty:dft))(Li, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
