Hector Portaluppi et al v. FortiFi Financial, Inc. et al
| Mrs. Carmen Portaluppi, Mr. Hector Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi and Carmen Portaluppi |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, FortiFi Financial, Inc. and Energy Efficient Equity, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv07959 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Otis D Wright |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1964 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Hector Portaluppi, Carmen Portaluppi(Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 24
The hearing on the MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 ; and MOTION to Strike #17 , scheduled for November 30, 2020 at 1:30 P.M., are hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matters stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 23
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mikle S Jew counsel for Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc.. Filed by Defendant FortiFi Financial, Inc. (f/k/a Energy Efficient Equity, Inc.) and County of Los Angeles. (Attorney Mikle S Jew added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Mikle S Jew added to party FortiFi Financial, Inc.(pty:dft))(Jew, Mikle)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Intent to File First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 21
JOINDER in NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 20
DECLARATION of Nicholas M. Gross in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 #17 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B to Gross Declaration, #2 Exhibit C to Gross Declaration, #3 Exhibit D to Gross Declaration, #4 Exhibit E to Gross Declaration, #5 Exhibit F to Gross Declaration, #6 Exhibit G to Gross Declaration, #7 Exhibit H to Gross Declaration)(Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 19
DECLARATION of Christopher Nard in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 #17 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Nard Declaration)(Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 18
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 #17 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, FortiFi Financial, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/30/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Nicholas Martin Gross added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft)) (Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant FortiFi Financial, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/30/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Nicholas Martin Gross added to party FortiFi Financial, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 15
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant FortiFi Financial, Inc. (Gross, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 14
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 10/30/2020, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Roger H Granbo, Jr added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Granbo, Roger)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer efiled previously efiled documents with Prior Electronic headers intact, thus making current electronic headers Illegible on page 1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 12
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Hector Portaluppi, Carmen Portaluppi. upon FortiFi Financial, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/31/2020, answer due 10/30/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Mikle S. Jew. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hector Portaluppi, Carmen Portaluppi, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 9/11/2020, answer due 10/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Clayton Liang, designated to accept service of process on behalf of County of Los Angeles in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 8
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant FortiFi Financial, Inc. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi, (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Portaluppi, Hector Portaluppi. (Harris, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-27862272 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Hector Portaluppi, Carmen Portaluppi. (Attorney David J Harris, Jr added to party Carmen Portaluppi(pty:pla), Attorney David J Harris, Jr added to party Hector Portaluppi(pty:pla))(Harris, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
