Kimberly Robinson v. BMW of North America, LLC
| Kimberly Robinson |
| BMW of North America, LLC |
| 2:2020cv07961 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| John E McDermott |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Jason M. Barmasse in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Barmasse, Jason) |
| Filing 21 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Barmasse, Jason) |
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 12/07/20 at 11:00 AM (pg)
|
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Romano, Mark) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Proposed Order re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Ken Christ in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Kate S. Lehrman in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) ; Demand for Jury Trial filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.(Barmasse, Jason) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald.The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court will accept the following no later than OCTOBER 16, 2020. BY DEFENDANT: RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT OR BY PLAINTIFF: APPLICATION FOR CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause by OCTOBER 16, 2020 will result in the dismissal of this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robinson.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Romano, Mark) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-07961 MWF(JEMx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. The Defendant does not consent. (Barmasse, Jason) |
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Kimberly Robinson. (Romano, Mark) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Kimberly Robinson.. (Romano, Mark) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-27887204 for $400 filing fee. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robinson in Ventura Superior Court on 2/27/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Jury Demand #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on August 31, 2020. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura Superior Court, case number 56-2020-00540584 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Kate S. Lehrman, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Attorney Kate S Lehrman added to party BMW of North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Lehrman, Kate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
