Terry Davis v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al
| Terry Davis |
| Allstate Indemnity Company and Does 1-20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07989 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01813 JGB (SHK). (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Allstate Indemnity Company, identifying Allstate Corporation. (Brooks, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company. (Brooks, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS2011161 Receipt No: ACACDC-27881524 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Allstate Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Complaint, #2 Superior Court Answer, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Benjamin D Brooks added to party Allstate Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Brooks, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
