Sharon Britt v. Southern California Edison Company et al
Sharon Britt, Andre Wall, Joshua Blalock and Jade Ball |
Southern California Edison Company and Does 1 through 25 |
2:2020cv08023 |
September 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M Olguin |
Alka Sagar |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff Jade Ball shall be paid a service payment of $5,000.00 in accordance with the terms of the Amended Settlement Agreement and the Order. Class counsel shall be paid $805,625.00 in attorney's fees, and $42,543.03 in costs inaccordance with the terms of the Amended Settlement Agreement and the Order. The Claims Administrator, ILYM, shall be paid $44,894.00 for its fees and expenses inaccordance with the terms of the Amended Settlement Agreement and the Order. The LWDA shall be paid $75,000.00 pursuant to the Amended Settlement Agreement. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv) |
Filing 96 ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement #83 is granted upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Order. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, Administration Costs, andClass Representative Service Award #82 is granted as set forth in this Order. (iv) |
Filing 95 Joint REQUEST for Ruling on Submitted Matter Pursuant to Local Rule 83-9.1 filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Blakely, Sean) |
Filing 94 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FEBRUARY 16, 2023 DEADLINE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT #91 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 93 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. regarding Order on Motion for Attorney Fees,, Order on Motion for Settlement,, Motion Hearing, #90 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sean M. Blakely in Support of Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, #2 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Madely Nava on Behalf of ILYM Group, Inc. Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration, #3 Proof of Service of Amended Proposed Settlement on The Labor and Workforce Development Agency)(Blakely, Sean) |
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement #83 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert S. Blumberg)(Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 91 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Supplemental Briefing from February 16, 2023 to February 21, 2023 filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue February 26, 2023 Deadline to File Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement)(Blakely, Sean) |
Filing 90 MINUTES OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES #82 ; MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT #83 held before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Defendant shall file a supplemental brief stating that it complied with the CAFA notice requirements no later than February 16, 2023. The Motions will be deemed submitted upon receipt of the supplemental brief, declarations and exhibits. Court Reporter: Maria Bustillos. (iv) |
Filing 89 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aden Mamore Khachadoorian counsel for Plaintiff Jade Ball. Adding Aden M. Khachadoorian as counsel of record for Plaintiff Jade Ball for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attorney Aden Mamore Khachadoorian added to party Jade Ball(pty:pla))(Khachadoorian, Aden) |
Filing 88 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR REMOTE APPEARANCE #87 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Request for Remote Appearance is denied. (iv) |
Filing 87 First REQUEST for Leave of co-counsel Jonathan M. Lebe to Appear for remote/telephonic to Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, Administration Costs, and Class Representative Service Award filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. Request set for hearing on 1/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe Requesting Remote Appearance for January 26, 2023, #2 Proposed Order Granting Request for Remote Appearance) (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 86 Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Lit. Expenses, Admin Costs and Class Rep. Service Award filed by Defendant Southern California Edison filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement #83 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 84 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sean M Blakely counsel for Plaintiff Jade Ball. Adding Sean M. Blakely as counsel of record for Plaintiff Jade Ball for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attorney Sean M Blakely added to party Jade Ball(pty:pla))(Blakely, Sean) |
Filing 83 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. Motion set for hearing on 1/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Madely Nava on Behalf of ILYM Group, Inc. Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration, #2 Proposed Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Final Judgment) (Haines, Paul) |
Filing 82 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees , Litigation Expenses, Administration Costs, and Class Representative Service Award filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. Motion set for hearing on 1/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul K. Haines in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, Administrative Costs, and Class Representative Service Award, #2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe in Support of Plaintiff Jade Ball's Unopposed Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, Administrative Costs, and Class Representative Service Award, #3 Declaration of Madely Nava on Behalf of ILYM Group, Inc. Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration, #4 Declaration of Plaintiff Jade Ball in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, #5 Proposed Order Granting Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses, Administration Costs, and Class Representative Service Award) (Haines, Paul) |
Filing 81 ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement #73 is granted. A final approval (fairness) hearing is hereby set for January 26, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (iv) |
Filing 80 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Class Action Settlement #73 Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Neil M. Larsen in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF BALL'S FEBRUARY 28, 2022 DEADLINE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT #78 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 78 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Plaintiff Ball's February 28, 2022 Deadline to File Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement from February 28, 2022 to March 14, 2022 filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue Plaintiff's Ball's February 28, 2022 Deadline to File Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 77 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SHARON BRITT, ANDRE WALL, AND JOSHUA BLALOCK, AND TO DISMISS UNION EMPLOYEES' CLASS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 76 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to Dismiss Plaintiffs Sharon Britt, Andre Wall, and Joshua Blalock, and to Dismiss Union Employees' Class Claims Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 75 MINUTES OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT #73 held before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff shall file a supplemental declaration and exhibits, including a revised Settlement Agreement, as requested on the record no later than February 28, 2022. Upon filing of the declaration and related exhibits, the motion will be deemed under submission. Court Reporter: Maria Bustillos. (iv) |
Filing 74 STATEMENT of Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Class Action Settlement #73 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 73 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Settlement Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. Motion set for hearing on 1/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul K. Haines in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe in Support of Plaintiff Jade Balls Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #3 Declaration of Tuvia Korobkin in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #4 Declaration of Neil M. Larsen in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #5 Declaration of Plaintiff Jade Ball in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, #6 Declaration of Sean Hartranft Re: Qualifications of ILYM Group, Inc. As Settlement Administrator, #7 Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) (Haines, Paul) |
Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF BALL'S NOVEMBER 15, 2021 DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT #71 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 71 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Plaintiff Balls November 15, 2021 Deadline to File Motion For Class Certification And Preliminary Approval Of Settlement Agreement from November 15, 2021 to December 15, 2021 Jade Ball. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue Plaintiff Balls November 15, 2021 Deadline To File Motion For Class Certification And Preliminary Approval Of Settlement Agreement)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF BALL'S NOVEMBER 1, 2021 DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT #69 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 69 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement from 11/01/2021 to 11/15/2021 filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF BALL'S OCTOBER 25, 2021 DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT #67 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 67 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement from 10/25/2021 to 11/1/2021 filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 66 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF BALL'S OCTOBER 4, 2021 DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT #65 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 65 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement from 10/04/2021 to 10/25/2021 filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Haines, Paul) |
Filing 64 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) Order Re: Notice of Settlement and Requirements Re: Preliminary Approval by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Having reviewed the Joint Post-Mediation Status Report and Notice of Settlement (Dkt. #61 ), filed on August 25, 2021, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. All pending deadlines and proceedings are hereby vacated. 2. Plaintiff Jade Ball (plaintiff) shall file a Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement (Motion) no later than October 4, 2021. Defendant is encouraged to also file a brief in support of the motion for preliminary approval. 3. Plaintiff is advised that the court will not grant the Motion unless it includes a discussion of the Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requirements, including but not limited to evidentiary support, where appropriate, regarding the following issues. See minute order for details. (lom) |
Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CAUSES OF ACTION IN PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT BE OFF-CALENDAR #58 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court HEREBY ORDERS, as follows: Defendant Southern California Edison Company (Defendant) Motion to Dismiss Causes of Action in Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint be taken off-calendar pending Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement. (lom) |
Filing 62 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Causes of Action in Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint from September 23, 2021 to Off-Calendar filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 61 STATUS REPORT re Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 60 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Paul K. Haines, Tuvia Korobkin, and Neil M. Larsen on behalf of Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall. Filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Sharon Britt, Andre Wall (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 59 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Causes of Action in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint #58 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 58 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Causes of Action in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/23/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Robert S. Blumberg ISO, #3 Proposed Order) (Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 57 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Plaintiffs amending Amended Complaint/Petition #46 , filed by Plaintiffs Joshua Blalock, Andre Wall, Sharon Britt, Jade Ball(Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 56 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT #55 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiffs may have until July 30, 2021 to file a Third Amended Complaint. (iv) |
Filing 55 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to Allow Plaintiffs to File a Third Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE OF MOTION TO DISMISS FILING DEADLINE #53 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv) |
Filing 53 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Motion to Dismiss and Answer Filing Deadline from 07/09/2021 to 07/23/2021 Re: Amended Complaint/Petition #46 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 52 NOTICE Consent to Sue under FLSA filed by Plaintiff Jade Ball. (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 51 NOTICE Consent to Sue under FLSA filed by Plaintiff Andre Wall. (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 50 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Jade Ball, Joshua Blalock, Andre Wall, (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 49 NOTICE Consent to Sue Under FLSA filed by Plaintiff Joshua Blalock. (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 48 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for dates and deadlines.* (iv) |
Filing 47 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #46 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1-1 is required for newly named plaintiffs no later than June 30, 2021. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 46 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Southern California Edison Company amending Amended Complaint/Petition #11 , filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt(Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 45 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Order Deadlines #41 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 44 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for dates and deadlines.* (iv) |
Filing 43 ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint #32 is granted. (iv) |
Filing 42 MINUTES OF (In Chambers): Order Re Informal Discovery Conference (Dkt. No. #38 ) held before Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The Court, having read and considered the parties' submissions, and the arguments presented at the hearing, GRANTS IN PART the parties' requests. (see document for further details) Court Recorder: AT&T 06/17/21. (hr) |
Filing 41 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Order Deadlines filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. Motion set for hearing on 7/15/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points And Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe, #3 Proposed Order) (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 40 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. On the court's own motion, the Motion to Amend #32 is taken off the 6/24/2021 calendar and placed under submission. An order with the court's ruling will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 39 REPLY In support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Amended Complaint/Petition #11 #32 filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Loera, Annaliz) |
Filing 38 MOTION RE: INFORMAL DISCOVERY DISPUTE. The matter is placed on calendar for June 17, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. A call-in number and password will be e-mailed to the parties. (et) |
Filing 37 NOTICE Consent to Sue Under FLSA filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 36 ORDER STRIKING by Judge Fernando M. Olguin Re: Miscellaneous Document #34 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): (1) Title page is missing. (vdr) |
Filing 35 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Consent #34 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page with caption and case number missing. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - Other Filings - Notices. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 34 **STRICKEN** Consent to Sue under the FLSA re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Lebe, Jonathan) Modified on 6/7/2021 (vdr). |
Filing 33 OPPOSITION In Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Amended Complaint/Petition #11 #32 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Documentary Evidence in Support of Opposition, #2 Proposed Order)(Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 32 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. Motion set for hearing on 6/24/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe, #3 Proposed Order) (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 31 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The deadline to amend the complaint is continued to June 14, 2021. (iv) |
Filing 30 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint #29 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Robert S. Blumberg, #2 Declaration Jacob Daniels, #3 Declaration Regina Ruelas, #4 Proposed Order)(Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 29 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Lebe, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service) (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Joint REQUEST for Protective Order #26 . (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 27 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulated Protective Order #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Stipulations Protective Order. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 26 Joint REQUEST for Protective Order for special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company.(Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 25 ORDER RE: CLASS ACTION & REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 24 ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 23 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. *See order for case deadlines and requirements.* (vdr) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION #20 FOR 7-DAY CONTINUANCE OF FRCP RULE 16(B) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for February 18, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., is continued to February 25, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (iv) |
Filing 21 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days - 3 weeks, filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company.. (Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from February 18, 2021 to February 25, 2021 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #18 filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert S Blumberg counsel for Defendant Southern California Edison Company. Adding Robert S. Blumberg as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Blumberg, Robert) |
Filing 18 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 2/18/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Demery Ryan counsel for Defendant Southern California Edison Company. Adding Demery Ryan as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (Attorney Demery Ryan added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:dft))(Ryan, Demery) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company, identifying Edison International. (Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company identifying Edison International as Corporate Parent. (Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #11 Answer to Plaintiff''s First Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Defendant Southern California Edison Company.(Attorney Alexandra Victoria Bernstein added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:dft))(Bernstein, Alexandra) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. correcting Amended Complaint/Petition #11 (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Sharon Britt amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt(Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Southern California Edison Company. (ghap) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt, identifying Sharon Britt, Southern California Edison Company. (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Lebe, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27898020 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sharon Britt. (Attorney Jonathan M Lebe added to party Sharon Britt(pty:pla))(Lebe, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.