Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Michael Houston et al
Liberty Insurance Corporation |
Jay Calvert, M.D., Professional Corporation, Jay W. Calvert and Michael Houston |
2:2020cv08029 |
September 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Stephen V Wilson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS SUA SPONTE DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. At the April 19, 2021 conference, the Court discussed this matter with the parties and expressed concern that the dispute between the remaining parties is not ripe for adjudication. For the foregoing reason, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mrgo) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MICHAEL HOUSTON WITH PREJUDICE approved by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Party #34 . Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with the dismissal with prejudice of defendant Michael Houston. Michael Houston (an individual) terminated. (mrgo) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Michael Houston filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Dismissal of Defendant Michael Houston with Prejudice)(Russum, Blake) |
Filing 33 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: On April 5, 2021, Liberty and Houston filed a notice of settlement in which they stated that they will prepare and execute a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal of Houston, upon execution of the confidential settlement agreement. No stipulation or proposed order was ever filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Houston are ORDERED to file their notice of dismissal within seven days of this order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 32 MINUTES OF TELEPHONE NEW CASE STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. All appearances, including the Court, are made by telephone. Conference held. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo) |
Filing 31 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson - The initial status status conference set for 04/19/2021 at 3:00 p.m., will proceed by telephone. The parties will be provided with the call-in information by email. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Russum, Blake) |
Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jessica Bich Anh Do counsel for Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. Jessica B. Do is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. (Do, Jessica) |
Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) DENYING #23 MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. For the foregoing reasons, Houston's motion to dismiss is DENIED. Houston is ORDERED to answer Liberty's complaint within fourteen days of this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Filing 27 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's First Cause of Action under FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant #23 - The motion is submitted. Order to issue. The hearing scheduled for 04/04/2021 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 26 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's First Cause of Action under FRCP 12(b)(6) #23 filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Russum, Blake) |
Filing 25 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jessica Bich Anh Do counsel for Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. Adding Jessica B. Do as counsel of record for Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Liberty Insurance Corporaton Jessca B. Do. (Attorney Jessica Bich Anh Do added to party Liberty Insurance Corporation(pty:pla))(Do, Jessica) |
Filing 24 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's First Cause of Action under FRCP 12(b)(6) #23 filed by Defendant Michael Houston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lopez, Michael) |
Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's First Cause of Action under FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Michael Houston. Motion set for hearing on 4/5/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lopez, Michael) |
Filing 22 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION'S REPORT TO COURT RE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS #11 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation shall have up to and including January 29, 2021 to serve the Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this Action. (iv) |
Filing 21 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 4/19/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 20 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Houston, identifying Liberty Insurance Corporation; Jay W. Calvert; Jay Calvert, M.D., Professional Corporation. (Lopez, Michael) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Michael Houston answer now due 3/5/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Michael Houston. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Michael Edward Lopez added to party Michael Houston(pty:dft))(Lopez, Michael) |
Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PRO SE DEFENDANT MICHAEL HOUSTON'S TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #17 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Michael Houston's time to respond to initial complaint is hereby extended up through and including February 19, 2021. (mrgo) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Russum, Blake) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Jay W. Calvert, Jay Calvert, M.D., Professional Corporation.(Attorney Neville Lawrence Johnson added to party Jay W. Calvert(pty:dft), Attorney Neville Lawrence Johnson added to party Jay Calvert, M.D., Professional Corporation(pty:dft))(Johnson, Neville) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation.(Russum, Blake) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation, served on Executed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation upon Defendant Michael Houston served on 11/30/202020, answer due 12/21/20. (Russum, Blake) |
Filing 12 IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson - The plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days to effect service. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 STATUS REPORT TO COURT RE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Russum, Blake) |
Filing 10 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jay W. Calvert. (esa) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jay Calvert, M.D., Professional Corporation. (esa) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Michael Houston. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation, identifying Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Holding Company, LMHC Massachusetts Holding, Inc., Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation, Defendants Michael Houston, Jay W. Calvert, Jay Calvert, M.D. Professional Corporation. (Russum, Blake) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Jay Calvert, M.D. Professional Corporation, #2 Summons - Jay Calvert)(Russum, Blake) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Russum, Blake) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27899947 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attorney Blake J Russum added to party Liberty Insurance Corporation(pty:pla))(Russum, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.