Floyd Dewaine Scott v. C. Johnson
Petitioner: Floyd Dewaine Scott
Respondent: C. Johnson
Case Number: 2:2020cv08046
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge James V. Selna. (et)
October 29, 2020 Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, Related to: Order Summarily Dismissing Case #8 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna. Court ORDERS Judgment be entered summarily DISMISSING this action with prejudice. (et)
October 1, 2020 Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #6 filed by Petitioner Floyd Dewaine Scott (hr)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why this Action Should Not Be Summarily Dismissed for Failure to State a Cognizable Habeas Claim by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/2/2020.(SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (Attachments: #1 Petition FORM, #2 Notice of Dismissal) (dts)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (dts)
September 3, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
August 31, 2020 Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Floyd Dewaine Scott. (dts)
August 31, 2020 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Floyd Dewaine Scott. The Petitioner does not consent. (car)
August 31, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Floyd Dewaine Scott. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Floyd Dewaine Scott v. C. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Floyd Dewaine Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: C. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?