Louis Garrett O'Haver v. Glenn Stern Law, et al
Plaintiff: Louis "Garrett&q O'Haver and Louis Garrett O'Haver
Defendant: GLENN STERN LAW, Glenn Stern, Matthew P. Malczynski and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv08047
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case number: 20STCV11786. (jp)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Re: Stipulation to Remand Action to State Court #12 . (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) See Order for specifics. (jp)
October 21, 2020 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendants Glenn Stern Law, Matthew P. Malczynski. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Matthew P Malczynski added to party Glenn Stern Law(pty:dft))(Malczynski, Matthew)
October 19, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order Remanding Removed Action to State Court; Declaration of Louis Garrett O'Haver; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, filed by plaintiff Louis Garrett O'Haver. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). (jp)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. FischerORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Court's rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that persons name (only if the person is an attorney) and the person's position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the "weeks before trial" column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this court's rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order re Removal by Local Defendant by Judge Dale S. Fischer. See order for specifics. (lom)
September 8, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by DEFENDANTS Glenn Stern Law, Glenn Stern.(Attorney Glenn E Stern added to party Glenn Stern Law(pty:dft), Attorney Glenn E Stern added to party Glenn Stern(pty:dft))(Stern, Glenn)
September 3, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): The pro se litigants' email addresses were added to CM/ECF in error upon the opening of this Notice of Removal case. The pro se litigants' email addresses have been removed from the CM/ECF and will not be used for electronic service without the appropriate registration and consent. See Local Rule 5-3.. (esa)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
September 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
September 3, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa)
September 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Glenn Stern Law, Matthew P. Malczynski, Glenn Stern, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Louis Garrett O'Haver. (filed in state court 3/24/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
September 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Louis Garrett O'Haver, upon Defendant Matthew P. Malczynski served on 7/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Matthew P Malczynski, defendant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 8/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
September 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Matthew P. Malczynski. (filed in state court 8/26/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 4)(esa)
September 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Louis Garrett O'Haver, upon Defendant Glenn Stern Law served on 8/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dolores Larrabe, Legal Assistant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 8/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 5) (esa)
September 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Louis Garrett O'Haver, upon Defendant Glenn Stern served on 8/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dolores Larrabe, Legal Assistant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 8/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 5, p. 4) (esa)
September 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Glenn Stern, (Stern, Glenn)
September 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Glenn Stern. (Stern, Glenn)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV11786 Receipt No: ACACDC-27906919 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Glenn Stern. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Glenn E Stern added to party Glenn Stern(pty:dft))(Stern, Glenn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Louis Garrett O'Haver v. Glenn Stern Law, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLENN STERN LAW
Represented By: Glenn E Stern
Represented By: Matthew P Malczynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenn Stern
Represented By: Glenn E Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew P. Malczynski
Represented By: Matthew P Malczynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louis "Garrett&q O'Haver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louis Garrett O'Haver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?