Deundre Grice v. Transdev Services, Inc. et al
| Deundre Grice |
| Transdev Services, Inc. and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv08093 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Andre Birotte |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, re Stipulation to Continue, #11 : The Court finds good cause; therefore, Stipulation is GRANTED. The scheduling conference is now set as follows: Date: January 8, 2021, Time: 10:00 a.m., Courtroom: 7B. (bm)
|
| Filing 11 First STIPULATION to Continue Stipulate to Continue Scheduling Conference from November 20, 2020 to By 30 days or whenever convenient for the court Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 filed by Plaintiff Counsel, Harout Messrelian, Esq. Deundre Grice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE)(Messrelian, Harout) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Assignment, Standing Order, Order Setting Scheduling Conference, Etc. filed by defendant Transdev Services, Inc.. (Tong, Jing) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Deundre Grice, upon Defendant Transdev Services, Inc. served on 8/4/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 58) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Transdev Services, Inc. (filed in state court 9/3/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Transdev Services, Inc, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Deundre Grice. (filed in state court 7/1/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Transdev Services, Inc.. (No Related Cases) (Tong, Jing) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Transdev Services, Inc. identifying Transdev North America, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Tong, Jing) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Transdev Services, Inc., identifying Transdev Services, Inc.; Gleason & Favarote, LLP; Deundre Grice; and Messrelian Law, P.C.. (Tong, Jing) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Transdev Services, Inc.. (Tong, Jing) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV24745 Receipt No: ACACDC-27929396 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Transdev Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jing Tong, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer) (Attorney Jing Tong added to party Transdev Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Tong, Jing) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
