Elena Coleman v. Mondelez International, Inc.
| Elena Coleman |
| Mondelez International, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv08100 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Mondelez International, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alexander M. Smith, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order) (Spelman, Kate) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Dean N. Panos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Mondelez International, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28707653) filed by Defendant Mondelez International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Spelman, Kate) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elena Coleman, upon Defendant Mondelez International, Inc. served on 9/9/2020, answer due 10/30/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Khalilah Starks, CT Corporation System Intake Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Alexander M Smith on behalf of Defendant Mondelez International, Inc. (Attorney Alexander M Smith added to party Mondelez International, Inc.(pty:dft))(Smith, Alexander) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mondelez International, Inc. answer now due 10/30/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Mondelez International, Inc..(Attorney Kate Spelman added to party Mondelez International, Inc.(pty:dft))(Spelman, Kate) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mondelez International, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elena Coleman, identifying Defendant Mondelez International, Inc.. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Elena Coleman. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Elena Coleman. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 09/03/2020, receipt number ACACDC-27930416), filed by Plaintiff Elena Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ELENA COLEMAN REGARDING VENUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1780(d)) (Attorney Ryan J Clarkson added to party Elena Coleman(pty:pla))(Clarkson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
