Zara Gemilyan v. Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, et al
| Zara Gemilyan |
| Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv08207 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #12 filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of Andrew Stefatos re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,,,,,,,, 14 OSC filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
Filing 20
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/16/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 19
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/18/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 11/9/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 18 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Robert L. Starr re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,,,,,,,, 14 filed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan. (Tang, Theodore) |
| Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Amended ; estimated length of trial 3, filed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Schedule)(Tang, Theodore) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #12 filed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan. (Tang, Theodore) |
|
Filing 14
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Courts rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Courts Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that persons name (only if the person is an attorney) and the persons position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Courts Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the weeks before trial column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this courts rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 Amendment to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #12 filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/16/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kate S. Lehrman, #2 Declaration of Bertha Anguiano, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Proposed Order) (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan.. (Starr, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan.. (Starr, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, filed by plaintiff Zara Gemilyan. (filed in state court 8/6/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 4) (esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Zara Gemilyan, upon Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC served on 8/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 1) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (filed in state court 9/4/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Jury Demand #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on September 8, 2020. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV29693 Receipt No: ACACDC-27985633 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Kate S Lehrman added to party Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC(pty:dft))(Lehrman, Kate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
