Scott Davenport v. China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD et al
Scott Davenport |
China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD, Does 1 through 10, and Does 1 through 10 |
2:2020cv08264 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
George H Wu |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu (lc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Scott Davenport. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Scott Davenport. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Scott Davenport. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Scott Davenport, (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28008944 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Scott Davenport. (Attorney Scott A Burroughs added to party Scott Davenport(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.