Raymond Aispuro v. Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Raymond Aispuro
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC, Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. and Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv08272
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Filing 21 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.. (Wright, Michael)
November 4, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Fair Collections & OutSourcing's Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): Case number wrong, missing assigned Judge and Magistrates initials as "2:20-CV-0872" should read completely as:2:20-cv-08272-ODW-PD. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for March 1, 2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, I (lc)
November 3, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc., identifying Great American Insurance Group. (Wright, Michael)
November 3, 2020 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc..(Wright, Michael)
October 13, 2020 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc. answer now due 11/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc..(Attorney Michael J Wright added to party Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wright, Michael)
October 12, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC, identifying Equifax Inc.. (Hendricks, Erica)
October 12, 2020 Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Equifax Information Services LLC answer now due 11/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC.(Attorney Erica Danielle Hendricks added to party Equifax Information Services LLC(pty:dft))(Hendricks, Erica)
September 30, 2020 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro, upon Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc. served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Susie Vang, Authorized Person in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Loker, Matthew)
September 30, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro, upon Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Susie Vang, Authorized Person in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Loker, Matthew)
September 15, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held #10 Although correct event was used, incorrect text as setting a scheduling conference for 1/4/21 was edited out as no such hearing is set on this case on this date and text corrected to reflect the above minute order. Copy of the minutes is also attached to this notice for reference. (lc)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) Modified on 9/15/2020 (lc).
September 14, 2020 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (et)
September 14, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc. (et)
September 14, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
September 14, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et)
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro, (Loker, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro. (Loker, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro. (Loker, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro. (Loker, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28010960 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Raymond Aispuro. (Attorney Matthew Michael Loker added to party Raymond Aispuro(pty:pla))(Loker, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond Aispuro v. Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC
Represented By: Erica Danielle Hendricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Aispuro
Represented By: Matthew Michael Loker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?