Zoom Room Franchising, LLC v. Carol Leung et al
Zoom Room Franchising, LLC |
Anne Popko, Steven Van Plew, Carol Leung and Does 1 through 30, inclusive |
2:2020cv08274 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #13 Response to Order To Show Cause Re Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC(Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis that Plaintiff fails to sufficiently plead a "case or controversy" and thus seeks an advisory opinion from this Court. Plaintiff's Response to this order shall be filed no later than October 1, 2020. (iv) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Steven Van Plew waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Anne Popko waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Carol Leung waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (see document for further details) (bm) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Carol Leung, Anne Popko, Steven Van Plew. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC identifying Zoom Room, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC, identifying Zoom Room, Inc.; Clyde Orange, LLC; Zoom Room IP, LLC; ZRSO, Inc.; Traeger Training, LLC; Carol Leung; Anne Popko; Steven Van Plew. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Laquer, Timothy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28011582 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Attorney Timothy Roy Laquer added to party Zoom Room Franchising, LLC(pty:pla))(Laquer, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.