Zoom Room Franchising, LLC v. Carol Leung et al
Plaintiff: Zoom Room Franchising, LLC
Defendant: Anne Popko, Steven Van Plew, Carol Leung and Does 1 through 30, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv08274
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Laquer, Timothy)
October 1, 2020 Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #13 Response to Order To Show Cause Re Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Laquer, Timothy)
October 1, 2020 Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC(Laquer, Timothy)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis that Plaintiff fails to sufficiently plead a "case or controversy" and thus seeks an advisory opinion from this Court. Plaintiff's Response to this order shall be filed no later than October 1, 2020. (iv)
September 14, 2020 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Steven Van Plew waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 14, 2020 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Anne Popko waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 14, 2020 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. upon Carol Leung waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/11/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Justin Kachadoorian, Esq.. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (see document for further details) (bm)
September 11, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Carol Leung, Anne Popko, Steven Van Plew. (car)
September 11, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
September 11, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car)
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 9, 2020 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC identifying Zoom Room, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 9, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC, identifying Zoom Room, Inc.; Clyde Orange, LLC; Zoom Room IP, LLC; ZRSO, Inc.; Traeger Training, LLC; Carol Leung; Anne Popko; Steven Van Plew. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 9, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Laquer, Timothy)
September 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28011582 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Zoom Room Franchising, LLC. (Attorney Timothy Roy Laquer added to party Zoom Room Franchising, LLC(pty:pla))(Laquer, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zoom Room Franchising, LLC v. Carol Leung et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zoom Room Franchising, LLC
Represented By: Timothy Roy Laquer
Represented By: Damian D Capozzola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Popko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Van Plew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carol Leung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 30, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?