In Re: EPD Investment Company, LLC et al
Debtor: EPD Investment Company, LLC and Jerrold Pressman
Appellee: Jason M. Rund and Robert Alan Robert A. Hessling, APC
Appellant: Creditor Poshow Ann Kirland and John C. Kirland
Case Number: 2:2020cv08292
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS SECOND INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 8023 #7 by Judge John F. Walter. The second appeal is dismissed without prejudice. The Trustee, Poshow, as trustee of the BC Trust, and Kirkland shall bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs regarding the second appeal. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
October 8, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8023 filed by Appellee Robert Alan Robert A. Hessling, APC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Approving Stipulation to Dismiss Second Interlocutory Appeal without Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8023)(Attorney Robert A Hessling added to party Robert Alan Robert A. Hessling, APC(pty:e))(Hessling, Robert)
September 18, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Electronic Filing re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #4 , Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court Order/Judgment, #1 , Notice Regarding Appeal from Bankruptcy Court (CV-26) - optional html form #3 , Notice of Referral of Appeal (Adversary) #2 e-mailed to Matthew F Kennedy at matthewfkeen@gmail.com bounced due to 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist.. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
September 15, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
September 15, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge John F. Walter. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (et)
September 10, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 8/25/2020. (et)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION: Re: Order re Second Interim Application for Award of Compensation entered on 8/11/2020 by Bankruptcy Judge Ernest M. Robles, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 8/24/2020. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:10-bkc-62208-ER, Adversary number: NONE, BAP case number: NONE., filed by Appellants Poshow Ann Kirland, John C. Kirland. (Attachments: #1 BK docket Sheet) (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: EPD Investment Company, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: EPD Investment Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Jerrold Pressman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Jason M. Rund
Represented By: Matthew F Kennedy
Represented By: Steven T Gubner
Represented By: Robert A Hessling
Represented By: Corey Ryan Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Robert Alan Robert A. Hessling, APC
Represented By: Robert A Hessling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Creditor Poshow Ann Kirland
Represented By: Stephen Eric Hyam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: John C. Kirland
Represented By: Stephen Eric Hyam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?