Danny Jerome Young v. Daniel E. Cueva
Danny Jerome Young |
Daniel E. Cueva |
2:2020cv08304 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Cormac J Carney |
Charles F Eick |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Herbert S. Tetef on behalf of Respondent Daniel E. Cueva. (Attorney Herbert S Tetef added to party Daniel E. Cueva(pty:res))(Tetef, Herbert) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Respondent's attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp) |
Filing 11 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Hereby Ordered that Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within 23 days of the date of this Order. All lodged odcuments must be numbered sequentially. Each lodged document must be stapled or otherwise securely fastened, and must bear the lodgment number and case number on the first page of the document. It is Further Ordered, that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within 15 days of the date that the Answer is filed. It is Further Ordered that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceedings to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Election, #3 Notice, #4 Judgment, #5 Order Dismissing, #6 Order Re COA, #7 Letter, #8 Motion, #9 Order Vacating) (sp) |
Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Hereby Ordered that Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within 23 days of the date of this Order. All lodged documents must be numbered sequentially. Each lodged document must be stapled or otherwise securely fastened, and must bear the lodgment number and case number on the first page of the document. It is Further Ordered that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within 15 days of the date that the Answer is filed. It is Further Ordered that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceeding to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (sp) |
Filing 9 ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney: granting #8 MOTION for Reconsideration. The Motion is granted. The Judgment is vacated. (sp) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Petitioner Danny Jerome Young. (sp) |
Filing 7 Letter from Danny J. Young re filing fee. (sp) |
Filing 6 Order by Judge Cormac J. Carney denying Certificate of Appealability. (mat) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to the "Order of Dismissal," It is Adjudged that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (sp) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (ghap) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Danny Jerome Young. The Petitioner does not consent. (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Danny Jerome Young. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Danny Jerome Young v. Daniel E. Cueva | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Daniel E. Cueva | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Danny Jerome Young | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.