Patricia McCarthy v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Patricia McCarthy |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv08415 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01910-JGB-SHKx. (car) |
| Filing 3 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Patricia McCarthy. (Tarczy, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tarczy, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC2002619 Receipt No: ACACDC-28075662 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Answer) (Attorney Benjamin Patrick Tarczy added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tarczy, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
