Francisco Garcia v. Los Angeles County et al
| Francisco Garcia |
| Nurse Perez, John Does, Tilton, Los Angeles County, Alex Villanueva, Peralta and Yhamel |
| 2:2020cv08528 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Supplemental DECLARATION of Francisco Garcia in Support of Motion to Compel Inmate Accounting or MCJ Legal Unit to Send A Certified Copy of His Financial Statement to the Court filed by Plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (es) |
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to File a Supplemental Amended Complaint (Dkt. 7) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiff should file his First Amended Complaint with the docket number assigned to this case (2:20-cv-08528-JVS-KES) within 30 days of the date of this order. (See document for details.) (Attachments: #1 (2 of 2) Attach Complaint) (es)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF in Support of Motion to Compel Inmate Accounting or MCJ Legal Unit to Send a Certified Copy of Francisco Garcia's Financial Statement to the Court filed by plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (es) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to File A Supplemental Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (es) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order DENYING without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiff's motion fails to demonstrate that appointment of counsel is appropriate at this time. His complaint lays out the relevant facts clearly and in significant detail. Plaintiff has been able to explain his allegations and what relief he is seeking. Considering the likelihood of his success on the merits (at least, as far as the Court can tell at this early stage in the litigation), Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to his renewing the request at a later date. (See document for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 5 Motion for Appointment filed by plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (es) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court,if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (lom)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants John Does, Los Angeles County, Peralta, Perez, Tilton, Alex Villanueva(Sheriff Los Angeles County, in individual capacity), Alex Villanueva(Sheriff Los Angeles County, in official capacity), Yhamel pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott, filed by plaintiff Francisco Garcia. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
