Brandon Che Lee v. Warden et al
Brandon Che Lee |
Warden, Cortez, Ramar, Fletcher, Trnsp Fund, Delgado, Watkins, Green, Johnson, Tate, Esqueda, Ruidro, Soles, Devera, Cesena, Unknown Staff, Sanchez, Espinoza and All of the staff who involved in this complaint |
2:2020cv08588 |
September 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Karen L Stevenson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Brandon Che Lee REG NO 45296-112 re Order to Show Cause #4 . (et) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Mail Returned addressed to Brandon Che Lee re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge #3 (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiff Brandon Che Lee. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsAll of the staff who involved in this complaint, Cesena, Cortez, Delgado, Devera, Espinoza, Esqueda, Fletcher, Green, Johnson, Ramar, Ruidro, Sanchez, Soles, Tate, Trnsp Fund, Unknown Staff, Warden, Watkins pursuant to 42:1983, filed by plaintiff Brandon Che Lee. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.