U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Merril et al
| U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Cameron R. Jezierski, Riverwalk Financial Corporation, Rhino Capital Holdings, LLC, Kevin B. Merril, Global Credit Recovery, LLC, Jay B Ledford, Rhino Capital Group, LLC, DeVille Asset Management Ltd and Delmarva Capital, LLC |
| 2:2020cv08792 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of New Case Number by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:20-mc-00145-UA. The previous case number, 2:20-cv-08792, is hereby terminated. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF RECEIVERSHIP (Pursuant to 28 USC 754) Receipt No: ACACDC-28231157 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Order Appointing Temporary Receiver, #2 Complaint, #3 Miscellaneous, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Christopher Claiborne Miles added to party U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla))(Miles, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
