Eric Sailor v. The People of the State of California et al
Eric Sailor |
J. Pickett and The People of the State of California |
2:2020cv08808 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Karen L Stevenson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, Related to: Order #3 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING PREMATURE REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED that the Request #1 is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Extend Time to file 2254 petition; MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by petitioner Eric Sailor. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.