Jessie Hatfield v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Jessie Harfield and Jessie Hatfield
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv08818
Filed: September 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-8818 PLA on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Amanda Schapel added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Schapel, Amanda)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Jessie Hatfield. (Rosales, Steven)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jessie Hatfield, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 10/7/2020, answer due 2/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to General Counsel. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rosales, Steven)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es)
September 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jessie Hatfield. (Rosales, Steven)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ch)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. #3 (ch)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons will be issued when the request to proceed in forma pauperis is approved. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jessie Harfield, (Rosales, Steven)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jessie Harfield. (Rosales, Steven)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jessie Harfield. (Rosales, Steven)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jessie Harfield. (Rosales, Steven)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Jessie Harfield. (Attorney Steven G Rosales added to party Jessie Harfield(pty:pla))(Rosales, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jessie Hatfield v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Amanda Schapel
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Harfield
Represented By: Steven G Rosales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Hatfield
Represented By: Steven G Rosales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?