Antranel Marshall v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Antranel Marshall
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv08850
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
2 Judge: Dolly M Gee
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-8850-DMG (Ex). (aco)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/31/2021. Joint status report re settlement due by 9/7/2021. (gk)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE COURT TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court has scheduled the dates set forth on the last page of this Order after review of the parties' Joint Scheduling Conference Report and the Court's own calendar. Therefore, the Court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and has vacated the hearing. The Court has scheduled a court trial for this matter, because the parties failed to make a timely request for a jury trial in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b) and Local Rule 38. Bench Trial set for 11/2/2021 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. See document for further details. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates) (gk)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having received the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report #12 , the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause dated November 2, 2020 #9 . A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. The parties' stipulation to extend #10 is DENIED as moot. In the future, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 7-1 and submit a proposed order with any stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED.IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 12, 2020 Filing 12 (Yeager, Kenneth)
November 12, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: There is no docket text. The stipulation seeks to set a meet and confer date and Joint Rule 26(f) Report deadline. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
November 9, 2020 Filing 10 (Yeager, Kenneth)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 9/29/2020, the Court set a Scheduling Conference #7 . Defendant's unilateral Rule 26(f) Report has been filed #8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing no later than 11/9/2020, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. Failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. The scheduling conference on 11/13/2020 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
October 30, 2020 Filing 8 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-6 days, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Carr, Cinnamon)
September 29, 2020 Filing 7 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/30/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 11/13/2020 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
September 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Costco Wholesale Corporation identifying Costco Wholesale Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Carr, Cinnamon)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Carr, Cinnamon)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV19815 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 09/28/2020, receipt number ACACDC-28275602), filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5) (Attorney Cinnamon J Carr added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:mov))(Carr, Cinnamon)
September 28, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/09/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
September 28, 2020 FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-28275602 for $400 filing fee. (Carr, Cinnamon)
September 28, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does 1 to 10, filed by Plaintiff Antranel Marshall. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antranel Marshall v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
Represented By: Richard Gary Somes
Represented By: Cinnamon J Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antranel Marshall
Represented By: Kenneth C Yeager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?