Chantal Gaines v. Dave H. Matayoshi et al
| Chantal Gaines |
| Dave H Matayoshi, others to be joined under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Tracy Yukio Ishino and Tracy Yukio Ishino an individual doing business as Legacy Real Estate |
| 2:2020cv08891 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: In light of the Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement #25 , the Court orders the action dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 45 days from the date of this Order if settlement not completed. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP. 41, which does not require approval of the Court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Stipulation Regarding filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines. (Iyalomhe, David) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/7/2022 03:00 PM; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 1/7/2022 at 03:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 1/18/2022 08:30 AM ( SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 23
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on March 26, 2021 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv)
|
|
Filing 22
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim re Stipulation for Protective Order #21 . (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Iyalomhe, David) |
|
Filing 20
INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (rrey)
|
| Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On its own motion, the court hereby continues the Scheduling Conference currently set for January 25, 2021 to March 26, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Iyalomhe, David) |
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines.. (Iyalomhe, David) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-191) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, this case is transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to the calendar of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-08891 FLA (SKx). (esa)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Tracy Yukio Ishino, Dave H Matayoshi, identifying 1. Crusader Insurance Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Unico American Corporation. Unico American Corporation is a publicly owned insurance holding company traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol UNAM. The majority of Crusaders policies are underwritten through an affiliated general agency, Unifax Insurance Systems, Inc.; 2. Lynette Matayoshi, a beneficiary under the D.H. and N.N. MATAYOSHI TRUST; 3. Duane Matayoshi, a beneficiary under the D.H. and N.N. MATAYOSHI TRUST; and 4. Doreen (Matayoshi) Labarge, a beneficiary under the D.H. and N.N. MATAYOSHI TRUST;. (Peterson, Rick) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 1/25/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Tracy Yukio Ishino, Dave H Matayoshi.(Peterson, Rick) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants Respond to Initial Complaint #11 up to and including 12/3/2020. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tracy Yukio Ishino answer now due 12/3/2020; Dave H Matayoshi answer now due 12/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Tracy Yukio Ishino; Dave H Matayoshi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Keyan Sedehi added to party Tracy Yukio Ishino(pty:dft), Attorney Keyan Sedehi added to party Dave H Matayoshi(pty:dft))(Sedehi, Keyan) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines, upon Defendant Dave H Matayoshi served on 10/21/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe, co-occupant/agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Okojie, Odion) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines, upon Defendant Tracy Yukio Ishino served on 10/21/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, co-occupant/agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Okojie, Odion) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Tracy Yukio Ishino, Dave H Matayoshi. (jtil) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines. (Okojie, Odion) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines, (Okojie, Odion) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines. (Okojie, Odion) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28277937 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Chantal Gaines. (Attorney Odion L Okojie added to party Chantal Gaines(pty:pla))(Okojie, Odion) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
