Watts Constructors, LLC v. Papich Construction Co., Inc. et al
Watts Constructors, LLC |
Does 1 to 20, Papich Construction Co., Inc. and Arch Insurance Company, Inc. |
2:2020cv08947 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Pedro V Castillo |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #13 , IT IS ORDERED that this action is STAYED in its entirety pending the outcome of the binding arbitration between Plaintiff and Papich, as set forth in Paragraph 1 of the parties' Stipulation. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the matters subject to arbitration in order to enter Judgment upon mediated resolution or any arbitration award that may be issued, and to enforce the parties' Stipulation and this Order. The parties are ORDERED to file a Status Report on 2/22/2021, explaining the progress of the arbitration and the anticipated date of completion. Failure to comply will result in the Court's issuance of an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (gk) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Defendant Papich Construction Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Vote, Kurt) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR.: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY BECAUSE IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (see document for further details) (bm) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendant Papich Construction Co., Inc..(Attorney Kurt F Vote added to party Papich Construction Co., Inc.(pty:dft))(Vote, Kurt) |
Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC, upon Defendant Arch Insurance Company, Inc. served on 10/7/2020, answer due 10/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Harris, Richard) |
Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC, upon Defendant Papich Construction Co., Inc. served on 10/8/2020, answer due 10/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Harris, Richard) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #2 as to defendants Arch Insurance Company, Inc., Papich Construction Co., Inc. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aaron P Silberman counsel for Plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC. Adding Aaron P./ Silberman as counsel of record for Watts Constructors, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC. (Attorney Aaron P Silberman added to party Watts Constructors, LLC(pty:pla))(Silberman, Aaron) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC, identifying Corporate Parent: Orascom Construction, PLC; affiliates: Orascom Holding Cooperatief, OCI Construction Holding Limited, Orascom Construction USA Inc., Contrack Watts Inc.. (Harris, Richard) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC. (Harris, Richard) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC. (Harris, Richard) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28311586 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Watts Constructors, LLC. (Attorney Richard M Harris added to party Watts Constructors, LLC(pty:pla))(Harris, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.