Orlando Garcia v. Viroj Watana et al
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Defendant: House of Pies, Inc., Viroj Watana and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2020cv08951
Filed: September 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2020 Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than 12/9/2020 why this action should not be dismissed as to all defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept Defendant's Answer to Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendant, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties in this action. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
November 24, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge John E McDermott to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-08951 SB (MAAx). (esa)
October 12, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Viroj Watana served on 10/10/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
October 12, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant House of Pies, Inc. served on 10/9/2020, answer due 10/30/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Richard Sharpe ( Claudine Santiago Office Manager) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
October 5, 2020 Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell)
October 2, 2020 Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. [SEE NOTICE FOR DETAILS.] (san)
October 1, 2020 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants House of Pies, Inc., Viroj Watana. (jtil)
October 1, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil)
September 30, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell)
September 30, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell)
September 30, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell)
September 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28308952 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orlando Garcia v. Viroj Watana et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: House of Pies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Viroj Watana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?