Orlando Garcia v. Katherine K. Etter et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Does 1-10, Arthur M. Kazarian, Populus Financial Group, Inc. and Katherine K. Etter |
| 2:2020cv08988 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Populus Financial Group, Inc. answer now due 12/2/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Populus Financial Group, Inc..(Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 13 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Arthur M. Kazarian answer now due 12/4/2020, filed by Defendant Arthur M. Kazarian.(Attorney Michael S Overing added to party Arthur M. Kazarian(pty:dft))(Overing, Michael) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Populus Financial Group, Inc. answer now due 11/16/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Populus Financial Group, Inc..(Attorney Bradford G Hughes added to party Populus Financial Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Order to Show Cause, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration of Dennis Price, #3 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Arthur M. Kazarian served on 10/15/2020, answer due 11/5/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than October 22, 2020. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Populus Financial Group, Inc. served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T Corporation System - peter cayetano intake specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Katherine K. Etter, Arthur M. Kazarian, Populus Financial Group, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28317759 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
