Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Configit A S
| Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. and Trilogy Software, Inc. |
| Configit A/S and Configit A S |
| 2:2020cv09019 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Alan R Kossoff counsel for Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. Changing firm name to Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump LLP. Filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. correcting Waiver of Service Executed, #17 (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Versata Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc.. upon Configit A S waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/8/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. Waiver of Service signed by David M. Hoffman. (Kossoff, Alan) |
Filing 16
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court&s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
|
| Filing 15 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael Chibib to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 10/9/2020, Receipt No. 28468043) filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - Texas, #3 Certificate of Good Standing - Washington) (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 14 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Conor M. Civins to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 10/9/2020, Receipt No. 28467919) filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-09019 JAK(MRWx). (rn) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Conor M. Civins to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28467919) #10 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael Chibib to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28468043) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael Chibib to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28468043) filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear) (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Conor M. Civins to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28467919) filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear) (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc.. of Change of Firm Name (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Conor M. Civins. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Configit A S. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc.. (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc.. (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc., identifying Versata Enterprises, Inc.. (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Versata Development Group, Inc., Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc.. (Kossoff, Alan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28334594 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Alan R Kossoff added to party Versata Development Group, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Alan R Kossoff added to party Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc.(pty:pla))(Kossoff, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
