Phil Limon v. Carpenters Local Union 721 et al
Phil Limon |
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters and Carpenters Local Union 721 |
2:2020cv09089 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Michael R Wilner |
Labor: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0401 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 12 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:17-cv-04426-DSF-MRWx. Case transferred from Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-09089-DSF-MRWx. Signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer (aco) |
Filing 11 21 DAYS Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Carpenters Local Union 721, Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters. (jp) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Phil Limon. (Katzenbach, Christopher) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Phil Limon, identifying Carpenters Local Union 721; Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters; United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joinders of America; Electronic & Space Technicians Local 1553. (Katzenbach, Christopher) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Phil Limon. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-08470-DSF (MRW) (Katzenbach, Christopher) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . Counsel shall file a Notice of Interested Parties as required by applicable rules. Failure to do so by 10/8/2020 may result in the striking of the complaint. (jre) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Phil Limon. (Katzenbach, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28365947 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Phil Limon. (Attorney Christopher W Katzenbach added to party Phil Limon(pty:pla))(Katzenbach, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.