Edward Weissbach v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
| Edward Weissbach |
| CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York |
| 2:2020cv09124 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York, identifying Cigna Life Insurance Company of New York (CLICNY); Connecticut General Corporation; Cigna Holdings, Inc; Cigna Holding Company and Cigna Corporation. (Ingram, Grant) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York.(Ingram, Grant) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York answer now due 12/2/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York.(Attorney Nicole Y Blohm added to party CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York(pty:dft))(Blohm, Nicole) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edward Weissbach, upon Defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stefoni Murphy, Intake Specialist, Authorized to Accept on Behalf of CT Corporation-Agent for Service in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bather, Phillip) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court&s Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-09124 JAK(JPRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Edward Weissbach. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Edward Weissbach. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 Certification & NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Edward Weissbach, (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28390270 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Edward Weissbach. (Attorney Phillip S Bather added to party Edward Weissbach(pty:pla))(Bather, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
