M. C. v. Los Angeles Unified School District
| M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B., and M. C. |
| Los Angeles Unified School District |
| 2:2020cv09127 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #5 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing S.B. as Guardian ad Litem for M.C. (hr)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting Ex Parte Application to file Under Seal: 1. Ex Parte Application for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for M.C.; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Consent to Serve of S.B. #6 by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (see document for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Los Angeles Unified School District. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| Filing 7 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of S.B. as Guardian ad Litem for M.C. under seal #6 filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of S.B. as Guardian ad Litem for M.C.)(German, David) |
| Filing 6 EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of S.B. as Guardian ad Litem for M.C. under seal filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration Pursuant to L.R. 7-19.1, #2 Declaration Declaration Regarding Need to File Appliction for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem Under Seal, #3 Redacted Document Redacted Document Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal, #4 Proposed Order)(German, David) |
| Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of S.B. as Guardian ad Litem for M.C. filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Pursuant to L.R. 7-19.1, #2 Declaration Regarding Need to File Appliction for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem Under Seal, #3 Redacted Document Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal, #4 Proposed Order) (German, David) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (German, David) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,, (German, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (German, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28390539 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Administrative Hearing Decision) (Attorney David Ward German added to party M.C. a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem S.B.,(pty:pla))(German, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
