Suterra LLC v. Mosaic AG Innovation Solutions, LLC, et al
| Suterra LLC and The Wonderful Company LLC |
| Mosaic AG Innovation Solutions, Llc, Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, The Mosaic Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv09167 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
ORDER TO STAY THE CASE FOR AN ADDITIONAL 14 DAYS, #34 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case be stayed for an additional 14 days.During the pendency of the stay: 1) In the event either party determines that a final settlement is not likely, either party may elect to terminate the stay and notify the Court and the opposing party that the stay is lifted; 2) From the date of the stay is lifted, Defendants shall have twenty (20) days in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint; 3) Should neither party notify the Court prior to termination of the fourteen (14) day stay that the stay is lifted, the case is to be automatically dismissed with either party having the option to request that the case be reopened. (shb)
|
| Filing 34 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending finalization of settlement filed by Plaintiffs Suterra LLC, The Wonderful Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 33 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order) (lom) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR 60-DAY STAY OF CASE #31 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings in the above-captioned action are stayed, absent the lifting of the stay as provided within the Stipulated Notice of Settlement and Request for 60 Day Stay of Case, for sixty (60) days pending the finalization of the Parties' settlement agreement. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 31 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Settlement filed by Defendants Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, The Mosaic Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bjorklund, Shannon) |
|
Filing 30
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, #29 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall have until January 26, 2021 to respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 29 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendants Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, The Mosaic Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bjorklund, Shannon) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond toFirst Amended Complaint, entered into by and between Plaintiffs Suterra LLC andThe Wonderful Company LLC and Defendants Mosaic Ag Innovation SolutionsLLC, and with good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall have until January 5, 2021 to respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.IT IS SO ORDERED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (shb)
|
| Filing 27 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendants Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, The Mosaic Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Shannon L. Bjorklund added to party The Mosaic Company(pty:dft))(Bjorklund, Shannon) |
| Filing 26 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #22 as to Defendant The Mosaic Company. (shb) |
|
Filing 25
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: granting #20 Request for Protective Order. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 24 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, in the Alternative, to Transfer #16 , previously scheduled for 11/30/2020 at 10:00 AM has been terminated, pursuant to STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint #19 , ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #21 and FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #22 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 23 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Amended Complaint/Petition #22 filed by plaintiffs Suterra LLC, The Wonderful Company LLC. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, The Mosaic Company amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Suterra LLC(Vasseghi, Michael) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #19 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint. 2. Defendant's responsive pleading shall be due fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. (lom)
|
| Filing 20 REQUEST for Protective Order for Confidential trade secrets [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order filed by plaintiff Suterra LLC.(Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Suterra LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION in opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, in the Alternative, to Transfer #16 filed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael M. Vasseghi, #2 Declaration of Stephanie Senner)(Vasseghi, Michael) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: GRANTING #13 Non-Resident Attorney Shannon L. Bjorklund APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant, Mosaic AG Innovation Solutions, LLC, designating John S. Baker as local counsel. (shb)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, in the Alternative, to Transfer filed by Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/30/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #2 Declaration of Shannon Bjorklund, #3 Declaration of Kim Nicholson, #4 Proposed Order) (Baker, John) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shannon L. Bjorklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 10/28/2020, Receipt No. 28748461) filed by Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Baker, John) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shannon L. Bjorklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28748461) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shannon L. Bjorklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28748461) filed by Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Baker, John) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC, identifying Mosaic AG Innovation Solutions, LLC, a limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Mosaic Company. (Baker, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney John S Baker on behalf of Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC (Attorney John S Baker added to party Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC(pty:dft))(Baker, John) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC, upon Defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC served on 10/9/2020, answer due 10/30/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Donna Moch, CT Corporation System, Inc. Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Mosaic Innovation Solutions, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (esa) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Suterra LLC. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Certification And Notice Of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC, identifying Suterra Holdings Llc, The Wonderful Company Llc, The Stew Art & Lynda Resnick Revocable Trust (1988), Wonderful Legacy Inc.. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC. (Vasseghi, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28412030 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Suterra LLC. (Attorney Michael M Vasseghi added to party Suterra LLC(pty:pla))(Vasseghi, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
