S.B.C. et al v. Santa Barbara County Child Welfare Services et al
S.B.C., T.C., Tanya Villalobos and Tanya Smith) |
Does 1-20, Santa Barbara County Child Welfare Services and Santa Barbara County |
2:2020cv09216 |
October 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M Olguin |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION #19 AND REQUEST TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiffs S.B.C., T.C.,and Tanya Villalobos are permitted to file a First Amended Complaint on or before January 4, 2021. (iv) |
Filing 19 First STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Santa Barbara County Child Welfare Services, Santa Barbara County. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Barbara A. Carroll, #2 Proposed Order on Joint Stipulation and Request to Permit Plaintiffs to File a First Amended Complaint)(Attorney Barbara A Carroll added to party Santa Barbara County Child Welfare Services (pty:dft), Attorney Barbara A Carroll added to party Santa Barbara County(pty:dft))(Carroll, Barbara) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #13 APPLICATION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem, appointing Tanya Villalobos (also known as "Tanya Smith") as Guardian ad Litem for T.C. (hr) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #12 APPLICATION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem, appointing Tanya Villalobos (also known as "Tanya Smith") as Guardian ad Litem for S.B.C. (hr) |
Filing 16 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for S.B.C. #12 , First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for T.C. #13 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #14 , by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The document is accepted as filed. Plaintiff is ordered to lodge proposed orders by November 16, 2020. (hr) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for S.B.C. #12 , First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for T.C. #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted as separate attachment. The documents are missing proposed orders. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 13 First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for T.C. filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villalobos. (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 12 First APPLICATION for Appointment of Tanya Villalobos as Guardian ad Litem for S.B.C. filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villalobos. (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the case title was added incorrectly Re: Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - form #7 . Correction has been made. Please see attached corrected ADR-8 form (Attachments: #1 Corrected ADR-8 Form) (car) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7.. (car) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Santa Barbara County Child Welfare Services . (car) Modified on 10/8/2020 (car). |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Santa Barbara County. (car) |
Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 10/8/2020, SEE DOCKET ITEM 11] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) Modified on 10/8/2020 (car). |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
Filing 5 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villobos, (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villobos. (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villobos. (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Tanya Villobos. (Marcus, Andrea) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28436078 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Tanya Villobos. (Attorney Andrea M Marcus added to party Tanya Villobos(pty:bkmov))(Marcus, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.