Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC v. GBT Inc
Plaintiff: Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC
Defendant: GBT Inc
Case Number: 2:2020cv09273
Filed: October 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2020 Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES Assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of this litigation in federal court. To "secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of this case, as called for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, all parties or their counsel are ordered to become familiar with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, and this Court's Standing Orders. (smo)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:20-cv-09273 MCS(SHKx). (rn)
October 9, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant GBT Inc. (et)
October 9, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 9, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et)
October 8, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC, identifying Patent Asset Management, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen)
October 8, 2020 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen)
October 8, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen)
October 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28454379 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC(pty:pla))(Lobbin, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC v. GBT Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Stephen M Lobbin
Represented By: Stephen M. Lobbin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GBT Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?