Feliciano Navarrette v. Huhtamaki, Inc., et al
| Feliciano Navarrette |
| Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Huhtamaki, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv09307 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jay S Rothman counsel for Plaintiff Feliciano Navarrette. Adding Jay S. Rothman as counsel of record for Plaintiff Feliciano Navarrete for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Feliciano Navarrete. (Attorney Jay S Rothman added to party Feliciano Navarrette(pty:pla))(Rothman, Jay) |
| Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alan James Leiva Sims counsel for Defendant Huhtamaki, Inc.. Adding Alan Sims as counsel of record for Huhatamaki for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Huhtamaki. (Attorney Alan James Leiva Sims added to party Huhtamaki, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sims, Alan) |
Filing 13
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11/8/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 12
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 2/1/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Defendant Huhtamaki, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Joint Report)(Ross, Sarah) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Huhtamaki, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on October 12, 2020. (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Huhtamaki, Inc.. Related Case(s): 19STCV19491 and 19STCV43672 (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Huhtamaki, Inc., (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Huhtamaki, Inc. identifying Huhtamaki Oyj as Corporate Parent. (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Huhtamaki, Inc.. (Ross, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV34219 Receipt No: ACACDC-28468860 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Huhtamaki, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Sarah Ross, #2 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Case Management Conference, #5 Exhibit D - Answer, #6 Declaration Amy Peterson) (Attorney Sarah Elana Ross added to party Huhtamaki, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ross, Sarah) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Huhtamaki, Inc., Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Feliciano Navarrette. (filed in state court 9/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 29) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Huhtamaki, Inc. (filed in state court 10/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 5)(esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
