Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Zara USA Inc et al
| Klauber Brothers, Inc. |
| Zara USA Inc, Does 1 through 10 and Zara USA, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv09395 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2021 at 09:00 AM. See order for further details. (jre)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Zara USA, Inc., (Anderson, Allan) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Zara USA, Inc..(Anderson, Allan) |
|
Filing 15
DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #14 . No good cause shown. (jp)
|
| Filing 14 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 6, 2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Zara USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Allan E Anderson added to party Zara USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Anderson, Allan) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc., upon Defendant Zara USA, Inc. served on 10/22/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service c/o Nicole Stauss, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Zara USA, Inc. answer now due 12/7/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Zara USA, Inc..(Attorney Jacob M Gilbert added to party Zara USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gilbert, Jacob) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Zara USA, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR re: STANDING ORDER #9 . Inadvertently filed/duplicative. Docket Entry No. #9 should be disregarded in favor of Docket Entry No. #8 . (jre) |
|
Filing 9
[DUPLICATE. SEE #8 ] STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) Modified on 10/14/2020 (jre).
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Klauber Brothers, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc., (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28513930 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc.. (Attorney Scott A Burroughs added to party Klauber Brothers, Inc.(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
