Landry Daniels aka Laundry Daniels v. J. Makarade et al
Landry Daniels and Laundry Daniels |
D. Asuncion, J. Colin, A. Serrano, D. Sanchez and J. Makarade |
2:2020cv09428 |
October 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Fernando M Olguin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint no later than December 18, 2020, remedying the deficiencies discussed herein. [See document for details.] (Attachments: #1 Attach.1 CV-66, #2 Attach.2 CV-09) (es) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Correcting Plaintiff's Name and Address by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: On November 6, 2020, the Court's Notice of Assignment and Reference (ECF No. 4) was returned as undeliverable. Upon review of the documents provided by plaintiff and reference to California's Inmate Locator, it has been determined that plaintiff's correct spelling of his name is "Laundry Daniels" and his current location is Kern Valley State Prison (KVSP) in Delano, California. See https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to update the docket as follows: Landry Daniels aka Laundry Daniels V82088 Kern Valley State Prison P.O. Box 5103 Delano, CA 93216-5103. [See document for further details.] (es) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned (rts attempted not known) addressed to Landry Daniels V82088 SVSP P O Box 1050 Soledad, CA 93960 re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) - optional html form #4 (es) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (See order for details.) (es) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: granting #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Landry Daniels. (esa) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by plaintiff Landry Daniels. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants D. Asuncion(Warden, in official capacity), D. Asuncion(Warden, in individual capacity), J. Colin(Correctional Officer, in official capacity), J. Colin(Correctional Officer, in individual capacity), J. Makarade(Correctional Officer, in official capacity), J. Makarade(Correctional Officer, in individual capacity), D. Sanchez(Correctional Officer, in individual capacity), D. Sanchez(Correctional Officer, in official capacity), A. Serrano(Correctional Officer, in individual capacity), A. Serrano(Correctional Officer, in official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F MacKinnon, filed by plaintiff Landry Daniels. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.