Jose Avila et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation
Raymond Ferrell, Jose Avila, Alfredo Vega, Rachel Bates, Betty Lewis, John Langley, Nury Bernal, Alan Roseman, Does 1-20, Hazel Benhamed-Masri, Brian Benhardt, John Coco, Claude Daniels, Raymond Maki, Herman Curley, Randy Walker and James Nakashian |
Atrium Medical Corporation |
2:2020cv09442 |
October 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Christina A Snyder |
Michael R Wilner |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Lee, Jae) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation, identifying Datascope Corp., Getinge Holding USA II, Inc., Getinge Holding USA, Inc., and Getinge AB. (Lee, Jae) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. (Lee, Jae) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court State of California, case number 20STCV34604 Receipt No: ACACDC-28549013 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Jae Hong Lee added to party Atrium Medical Corporation(pty:dft))(Lee, Jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.