Orlando Garcia v. Diane D. Graham et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Concepcion Analicia Muro, Diane D. Graham and Everardo Acosta Muro |
| 2:2020cv09483 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for March 15, 2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #16 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #17 by defendants Diane D. Graham as an individual and as trustee of the Margaret K. Muller Trust No. 2; and Concepcion Analicia Muro and Everardo Acosta Mura. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Concepcion Analicia Muro, Everardo Acosta Muro. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Jonathan Seigel added to party Concepcion Analicia Muro(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan Seigel added to party Everardo Acosta Muro(pty:dft))(Seigel, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Diane D. Graham, Diane D. Graham. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Jonathan Seigel added to party Diane D. Graham(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan Seigel added to party Diane D. Graham(pty:dft))(Seigel, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Diane D. Graham served on 10/30/2020, answer due 11/20/2020; Diane D. Graham served on 10/30/2020, answer due 11/20/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Everardo Acosta Muro served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Concepcion Analicia Muro served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel to the Courts Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing No latter than November 3, 2020 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without furtherwarning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (lc)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Diane D. Graham, Diane D. Graham, Concepcion Analicia Muro, Everardo Acosta Muro. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28564140 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
