Varel Inc v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. et al
Varel Inc |
Right Way Insurance Services, Inc., Does 1 thorugh 100, Hiscox Insurance Company Inc, Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 100 |
2:2020cv09530 |
October 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeannie E Choi counsel for Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. Patrick A. Maher will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.; Austin Matthew Groszewski. (Choi, Jeannie) |
Filing 40 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeannie E Choi counsel for Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. Jeannie E.J. Choi will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.; Austin Matthew Groszewski. (Choi, Jeannie) |
Filing 39 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeannie E Choi counsel for Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. Lori E. Siderman will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.; Austin Matthew Groszewski. (Choi, Jeannie) |
Filing 38 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #35 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests > Leave to File Document. The filer used the event, Miscellaneous Filings > Supplement. The Supplemental Brief is separately filed as document number 36. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 37 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HISCOX INSURANCE COMPANY INC.'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 36 SUPPLEMENT to Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #23 filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 35 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN OPPOSITION filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #23 (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 34 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 33 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANTS AUSTIN MATTHEW GROSZEWSKI AND RIGHTWAY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. ONLY AND NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #32 , the Court orders that Plaintiff's Complaint as to defendants Austin Matthew Groszewski and Right Way Insurance Services, Inc. (collectively, "RWIS") is dismissed, with prejudice. RWIS' Motion to Dismiss #26 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is withdrawn. Plaintiff and RWIS shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs as to RWIS' dismissal. (gk) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc. filed by Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Choi, Jeannie) |
Filing 31 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc., identifying Cole Groszewski; Certain Subscribing Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Choi, Jeannie) |
Filing 30 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court sua sponte continues Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to the Los Angeles Superior Court #15 and the scheduling conference #14 to December 18, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Responses/Replies/Other Motion Related Documents > Reply (Motion related). The filer used the event, Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/ Requests > Remand Case to State Court, for docketing this filing. This docket entry created a duplicative hearing on the 12/4/2020 calendar, thus, clerk shall remove this Reply, only, from the pending motion report. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 27 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action #26 filed by Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. (Maher, Patrick) |
Filing 26 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action filed by Defendants Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/18/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Austin Matthew Groszewski, #2 Declaration of Jeannie E.J. Choi, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Patrick A Maher added to party Autsin Matthew Groszewski(pty:dft), Attorney Patrick A Maher added to party Right Way Insurance Services, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Maher, Patrick) |
Filing 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Varel Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/4/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Anapol, Neil) |
Filing 24 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 23 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration #15 filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Celeste Coco-Ewing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, designating Christopher Wesierski as local counsel #18 . (iv) |
Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Janelle Sharer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, designating Christopher Wesierski as local counsel #17 . (iv) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Judy Barrasso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, designating Christopher Wesierski as local counsel #16 . (iv) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Janelle E. Sharer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774435) #17 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Judy Y. Barrasso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774355) #16 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Celeste R. Coco-Ewing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774473) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Celeste R. Coco-Ewing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774473) filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Janelle E. Sharer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774435) filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Judy Y. Barrasso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28774355) filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Plaintiff Varel Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/4/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Remand) (Anapol, Neil) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/27/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 12/11/2020 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc..(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 19-03 filed on October 20, 2020. Please substitute the initials DMG in place of the current initials, so that the case number will now read CV 20-9530-DMG (JPRx). (iv) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:20-cv-09530 DMG(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.. (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Autsin Matthew Groszewski, Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc., Right Way Insurance Services, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Varel Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/22/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company Inc, (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4)(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. Exhibit L as to Declaration, #2 . (Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of MARK RAYMOND re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV27552 Receipt No: ACACDC-28580239 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5) (Attorney Christopher P Wesierski added to party Hiscox Insurance Company Inc(pty:dft))(Wesierski, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.