Juan Garibay v. Mehboob Mahida
Juan Garibay |
Mehboob Mahida |
2:2020cv09551 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for April 12, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. See order for details. (lom) |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mehboob Mahida.(Worthge, Mark) |
Filing 16 ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MEHBOOB MAHIDA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO DECEMBER 17, 2020 #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mehboob Mahida. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Mark Kenneth Worthge added to party Mehboob Mahida(pty:dft))(Worthge, Mark) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to the Courts Order to Show Cause. The Court denies Plaintiff's request to certify a constitutional question to California's Attorney General. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibayto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration of Dennis Price, #3 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay, upon Defendant Mehboob Mahida served on 10/27/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, #10 served on 10/30/2020. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ENUMERATED REQUIREMENTS AND DEADLINES THEREIN). The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing No Later Than November 3, 2020 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (c). (lc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mehboob Mahida. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28597206 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Juan Garibay(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.