Rocco Tallarita v. Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rocco Tallarita
Defendant: James Richman, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv09557
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 7/27/21. (rfi)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/20/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 10/19/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
December 16, 2020 Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 11, 2020 Filing 16 DECLARATION of Geoffrey Lee Showing Cause Why Monetary Sanctions Should Not Issue filed by Defendant Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lee, Loren)
December 10, 2020 Filing 15 DECLARATION of Jeremy Golan re Report #14 filed by Plaintiff Rocco Tallarita. (Golan, Jeremy)
December 10, 2020 Filing 14 AMENDED JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(F) filed by Plaintiff Rocco Tallarita. (Golan, Jeremy)
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Court's rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that person's name (only if the person is an attorney) and the person's position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the "weeks before trial" column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this Court's rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 7, 2020 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(F) filed by Plaintiff Rocco Tallarita. (Golan, Jeremy)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
November 6, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Avina, Zachary)
November 2, 2020 Filing 9 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant James Richman filed by Defendants James Richman, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lee, Loren)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (tj)
October 20, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Defendants Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., James Richman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(Lee, Loren)
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
October 20, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa)
October 19, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., James Richman, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Rocco Tallarita. (filed in state court 9/8/30, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
October 19, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., James Richman, identifying Rocco Tallarita, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc. and Zurich North America. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lee, Loren)
October 19, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc., James Richman. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lee, Loren)
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV34416 Receipt No: ACACDC-28599560 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants James Richman, Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of L. Geoffrey Lee, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, Civil Cover Sheet and Peremptory Strike Notice, #4 Declaration of James Richamn, #5 Exhibit C - Certificate o Standing, #6 Exhibit D - Entiity Information, #7 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Loren Geoffrey Lee added to party Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Loren Geoffrey Lee added to party James Richman(pty:dft))(Lee, Loren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rocco Tallarita v. Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rocco Tallarita
Represented By: Jeremy Michael Golan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Richman
Represented By: Loren Geoffrey Lee
Represented By: Zachary I Avina
Represented By: Roger M Mansukhani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richloom Fabrics Group, Inc.
Represented By: Loren Geoffrey Lee
Represented By: Zachary I Avina
Represented By: Roger M Mansukhani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?