Leemanuel Weilch v. Ramon Salazar Portillo et al
LEEMANUEL WEILCH |
FRANCES E. MCKENNA, RAMON SALAZAR PORTILLO doing business as CINCO DE MAYO RESTAURANT and DOES 1 to 10 |
2:2020cv09572 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Mark C Scarsi |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc) |
Filing 14 NOTICE NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilch. re: ECF No. 12 (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilchto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilchto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING BY COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE UNRUH ACT CLAIM AND ANY OTHER STATE LAW CLAIM ASSERTED IN THE COMPLAINT WITH 14 DAYS. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Courts dismissal of the entire action without prejudice, or the Courts declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (c). (lc) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi:ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AS ENUMERATED THEREIN). Monetary sanctions will be imposed for failure to comply. The first failure to comply with this Order will result in a sanction of $300.00, the second failure will result in a sanction of $450.00, and any further failure will result in a sanction of $750.00. (lc) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI (SEE DOCUMENT FOR COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SERVICE OF THIS ORDER ON ALL PARTIES BY PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IF CASE CAME TO THE COURT AS A PETITION FOR REMOVAL) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Frances E. McKenna, Ramon Salazar Portillo. (jtil) |
Filing 7 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28602627 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party LEEMANUEL WEILCH(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.