MidCap Funding XVIII Trust v. CSC Logic, Inc.
Plaintiff: MidCap Funding XVIII Trust
Defendant: CSC Logic, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv09648
Filed: October 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Referring Judge: Christina A Snyder
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Filing 10 SECOND AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MidCap Funding XVIII Trust. (Adams, William)
October 21, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying N/A. (Adams, William)
October 21, 2020 Filing 8 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MidCap Funding XVIII Trust. (Adams, William)
October 21, 2020 Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 filed by Plaintiff MidCap Funding XVIII Trust. (Adams, William)
October 21, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. Refile the summons as a summons request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa)
October 21, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Civil cover sheet and request to issue summons incorrectly submitted as attachments to a duplicate complaint. Each of these documents should be filed in under its correct event/relief. The civil cover sheet is not signed. (esa)
October 21, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
October 21, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa)
October 21, 2020 Filing 2 * CIVIL COVER SHEET * AND SUMMONS REQUEST * filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 10/21/2020, receipt number 28636779), filed by Plaintiff MidCap Funding XVIII Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet summons)(Adams, William) Modified on 10/21/2020 (esa).
October 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28636779 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MidCap Funding XVIII Trust. (Attorney William E Adams added to party MidCap Funding XVIII Trust(pty:pla))(Adams, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MidCap Funding XVIII Trust v. CSC Logic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSC Logic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MidCap Funding XVIII Trust
Represented By: William E Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?