Vertex Survey, Inc. v. FCA US LLC et al
| Vertex Survey, Inc. |
| DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,, FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive |
| 2:2020cv09716 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| George H Wu |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-09573 (Stanton, Garrett) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, identifying FCA North America Holdings, LLC; FCA Holdco B.V.; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V.. (Stanton, Garrett) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Stanton, Garrett) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura County, Superior Court of California, case number 56-2020-00545107-CU-BC-VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-28666905 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard L. Stuhlbarg, #2 Declaration of Garrett B. Stanton, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K) (Attorney Garrett B Stanton added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Stanton, Garrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
