Nehemiah Kong v. Pings Apartment, LLC
| Nehemiah Kong |
| Ping's Apartment, LLC and Pings Apartment, LLC |
| Robert Keehn |
| 2:2020cv09734 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 STATEMENT of case filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong (Montgomery, Elliott) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Elliott Montgomery on behalf of Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. Filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong (Attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Montgomery, Elliott) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Robert Keehn has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Robert Keehn may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong(Montgomery, Elliott) |
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: granting #16 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Pings Apartment LLC. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 2/15/2021. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Pings Apartment, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Parrish, Paige) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pings Apartment, LLC answer now due 12/15/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Pings Apartment, LLC.(Attorney Paige R Parrish added to party Pings Apartment, LLC(pty:dft))(Parrish, Paige) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice (lc)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kongto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration of Dennis Price, #3 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Pings Apartment, LLC served on 10/31/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Betty Sit in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi:ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AS ENUMERATED THEREIN). Monetary sanctions will be imposed for failure to comply. The first failure to comply with this Order will result in a sanction of $300.00, the second failure will result in a sanction of $450.00, and any further failure will result in a sanction of $750.00. (lc)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING BY COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE UNRUH ACT CLAIM AND ANY OTHER STATE LAW CLAIM ASSERTED IN THE COMPLAINT WITH 14 DAYS. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Courts dismissal of the entire action without prejudice, or the Courts declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of this litigation in federal court. To "secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of this case, all parties or their counsel are ordered to become familiar with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, and this Courts Standing Orders. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Pings Apartment, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28675805 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
