David Gregory Flores v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: David Gregory Florres and David Gregory Flores
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv09752
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (mba)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (mba)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Granting #7 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (mba)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff David Gregory Florres. (Aghai, Sima)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (jtil)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff David Gregory Florres, (Aghai, Sima)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Gregory Florres. (Aghai, Sima)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff David Gregory Florres. (Aghai, Sima)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff David Gregory Florres. (Attorney Sima G Aghai added to party David Gregory Florres(pty:pla))(Aghai, Sima)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Gregory Flores v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Gregory Florres
Represented By: Sima G Aghai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Gregory Flores
Represented By: Sima G Aghai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?