Terry Fabricant v. Main Street Host, Inc.
Terry Fabricant |
Maint Street Host, Inc. and Main Street Host, Inc. |
2:2020cv09773 |
October 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Dolly M Gee |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Anthony I. Paronich to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, designating Adam J. Schwartz as local counsel #10 , #13 . (gk) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. upon Main Street Host, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/9/2020, answer due 1/8/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Christine M. Reilly. (Paronich, Anthony) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anthony I. Paronich to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Terry Fabricant (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 11/2/2020, Receipt No. 28824330) filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear filed 11/2/2020 #10 . Plaintiff shall file an amended Application within 14 days of this order. Failure to comply will result in the application being denied and the fees returned by the Clerk. (gk) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anthony I. Paronich to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Terry Fabricant (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28824330) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). Proposed Order is not flattened. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anthony I. Paronich to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Terry Fabricant (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28824330) filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Main Street Host, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Amended NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Schwartz, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28687533 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Attorney Adam J Schwartz added to party Terry Fabricant(pty:pla))(Schwartz, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.